Monday, June 10, 2013

The Hangover Part III: Full Review



The Hangover Part III- (May 23rd, 2013): R

Distributor: Warner Bros. Pictures

Opening Weekend Box Office: #2 with $41,671,198

Domestic Box Office Gross to-date: $102,337,370

Gross Revenue: $272,837,370

Production Budget: $103 million

Director: Todd Phillips
 
In addition to increasing the overall level of bachelor party pilgrimages to Vegas, 2009’s The Hangover made household names of its newcomer cast and rocketed each of them to A-list status, so there was an undeniable logic in developing this offbeat tale into a franchise.  Unfortunately, despite the fact that it represented the biggest worldwide opening for an R-rated comedy, The Hangover Part II was definitively panned and served as glaring proof that lightning couldn’t strike the same place twice; but Warner Bros. certainly wasn’t going to let those kinds of numbers sit idly by, so Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, and Zach Galifianakis were brought back to close-out the story.  Based on early print ads and posters featuring taglines like “The End,” it was clear that the filmmakers were promising an epic conclusion to the series, and in returning the setting to Vegas and bringing back familiar faces like Heather Graham, there was a chance that some of the charm and magic of the original film would be recaptured.  To be honest, I wasn’t completely sold on The Hangover Part III, but when the release trailers not only promised a new story but also heavily featured fan favorites like Ken Jeong and newcomers John Goodman and Melissa McCarthy, I started to hope for the best.  It was certainly going to be a challenge to pull jaded fans of the franchise away from direct competitors like Fast Six on Memorial Day Weekend, but as arguably the highest profile comedy of the summer, there was a chance that “The Wolfpack” would reign supreme.

Picking up two years after the disastrous events in Bangkok, The Hangover Part III finds Doug Billings (Justin Bartha), Phil Wenneck (Bradley Cooper), and Stu Price (Ed Helms) staging an intervention for the increasingly erratic Alan Garner (Zach Galifianakis), who eventually agrees to visit a rehab facility as long as his friends will take him there via road trip.  En route, the group is ambushed by Marshall (John Goodman), a ruthless gangster who has been searching for Leslie Chow (Ken Jeong) ever since Chow stole $21 million in gold bricks from him and subsequently escaped a maximum-security prison.  Given Chow’s previous association with “The Wolfpack,” Marshall figures that this group has the best chance of locating the elusive criminal; so, keeping Doug as collateral, Marshall orders Phil, Stu, and Alan to locate and deliver Chow within 72 hours.  After several failed attempts to subdue Chow upon finding him in Tijuana, the trio eventually tracks their quarry back to Las Vegas, thereby triggering many unwanted memories and virtually guaranteeing that events will quickly spiral out of control.  With the help of new acquaintances like pawnshop owner Cassie (Melissa McCarthy) and old friends like former-stripper Jade (Heather Graham), “The Wolfpack” discovers that Chow is barricaded within Caesar’s Palace, and they must now use all of the resources at their disposal to capture the fugitive in order to placate Marshall and rectify their current predicament.

In taking our characters back to Vegas, the filmmakers had a fleeting chance to redeem and restore this comedy franchise after its beleaguered second outing, but unfortunately, from tired personalities to flat jokes and nonsensical genre shifts, The Hangover Part III misfires on almost every level.  This may seem like far too subjective a criticism, but in my opinion the narrative relies far too heavily on the inherent appeal of Ken Jeong and Zach Galifianakis; the characters of Leslie Chow and Alan Garner were funny and refreshing when first introduced, but after three movies, these two are shamefully one note and their novelty has worn very, very thin.  You really have to love every word that comes out of the mouths of these actors to tolerate the focus that they are granted without any innovative or genuinely inspired help from the script…I mean, is it really that funny to see Jeong show up screaming and naked…AGAIN?  And really, “funny” is pretty loosely defined in this sequel, because aside from the giraffe decapitation (which was already shown and therefore spoiled in the trailers), there are very few, if any, laugh-out-loud moments that stem from something other than juvenile shock value.  Now, I may have been inclined to be a little more forgiving had this high-profile release served as the second entry in the Hangover franchise, but in being the third installment, Part III fell far short of some very reasonable expectations.

I suppose that there should be some modicum of gratitude concerning the fact that this sequel did not tell the exact same story for the third time, but in trying to be original, The Hangover Part III departs so drastically from franchise formula that it could very justifiably lose its qualification as a “comedy.”  Even forgetting the nonsensical plausibility of three average men agreeing to chase down an international criminal and deliver him to certain death, what audiences are left with is more akin to a chase or crime film that comes across as more mean-spirited than light-hearted.  There were some clear attempts to inject some novelty by including McCarthy and Graham, but the former’s role offered a few throwaway chuckles at best, while the latter’s reintroduction (alongside her now-4 year old, “Carlos”) was entirely useless and felt like little more than a waste of time.  Even Ed Helms and Bradley Cooper appear to be phoning it in for this film, which is especially disappointing and seems like a major step backwards for the now Academy Award-nominated Cooper…what a waste.  So, look as hard as you want to, but there are few redeeming qualities to this final chapter of a trilogy that was on life support back in 2009 and is now officially six feet under.

In terms of head-to-head box office showdown, The Hangover Part III was targeting an audience nearly identical to the one sought out by Universal’s Fast & Furious 6, but given the perceived quality of the competitor’s respective predecessors, it is not all that surprising that Vin Diesel and his racing team made road kill out of “The Wolfpack.”  In a season when you are essentially granted one weekend to turn a profit, Warner Bros. had to be concerned about a $41 million second place opening against an over-$100 million production budget (a number that is especially insulting when you consider that the far superior original was made for $35 million).  And yet, due to an inexplicably-strong international presence, Warner Bros. has earned a gross revenue just north of $200 million, so temptations to keep the franchise alive have to be mulling in the back of some executive’s head…good lord, I hope it’s not the same guy who signed-off on Jack the Giant Slayer’s budget.  The post-credits scene does leave the door open for another potential chapter, but for the love of everything that is good and decent in this world, this series needs to die and the characters need to disappear, only to be remembered from a nostalgic pining for 2009.  I don’t know how many more ways I can say it, but please take my word for it that The Hangover Part III is not worth your time or money, unless of course you are overtly compelled to see what will likely be labeled as the worst film of the summer.
        
Overall Recommendation: Very Low