Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Jack the Giant Slayer: Full Review




Jack the Giant Slayer - (March 1, 2013): PG-13

Distributor: Warner Bros. Pictures
    
Opening Weekend Box Office: #1 with $27,202,226

Domestic Box Office Gross to-date: $44,557,673

Gross Revenue: $67,157,673

Production Budget: $195 million

Director: Bryan Singer

Originally titled “Jack the Giant Killer,” Warner Bros. wisely decided to re-position its newest release with a more family-friendly pitch, and so, there was significant hope that Jack the Giant Slayer would capture the imaginations of audiences both young and old.  Hearing “Fee-Fi-Fo-Fum” in the trailer was an effective nostalgic attention-grabber, and even though they weren’t the main focus of promotions, I was impressed with the talented supporting cast; especially Ewan McGregor, who hasn’t been seen in a mainstream blockbuster since 2009’s Angels & Demons.  And yet, since it represented the first true big-budget popcorn flick after the notoriously slow February box office, I was surprised that the marketing strategy for this March release didn’t try more to make a battle with giants the must-see cinematic event of the spring.  Yes, there were partnerships with the National Wildlife Federation and coffee beaneries (magic beans…get it?), but awareness of the Carl’s Jr. cross-promotion was non-existent, and the truth is that, leading up to release, I shouldn’t have been able to turn a corner without seeing the giants as action figures or prequel book tie-ins.  Something had to be done to bring the classic fairy tale back to the attention of this current generation of children, so that they too would fill theaters with those who grew up with the tale as a bedtime story…for instance, I would have negotiated with Disney to ensure that the Mickey version of “Jack and the Beanstalk” was a hyped presence on children’s networks.  I have no problem in admitting that I was excited for Jack the Giant Slayer, but as early reviews and ticket sales began rolling-in, it didn’t look my enthusiasm was as shared as studio executives might have hoped.

Beginning in exposition, Jack the Giant Slayer first details the ancient legend of King Erik of Cloister, a brave ruler who defeated an army of giants using a magic crown and banished them to a sky realm only accessible by a giant beanstalk that was grown from magic beans; after the beanstalk was cut down, both the crown and beans were thought lost forever.  Shift focus to the reality of Jack (Nicholas Hoult), a struggling farmhand who goes into town to sell his horse, only to both meet and form a bond with the young Princess Isabelle (Eleanor Tomlinson), while also losing the horse to a fleeing monk who is only able to offer beans as collateral.  The princess is unhappy because she is being forced into an arranged marriage with the conniving Lord Roderick (Stanley Tucci) by her father, King Brahmwell (Ian McShane), so she decides to flee the safety of the castle, eventually seeking refuge at Jack’s farm.  As it begins to rain, the leaky roof causes one of the beans to get wet, at which point a giant beanstalk shoots into the sky, trapping Isabelle in the heavens and leaving Jack behind and bewildered; explaining the situation to the king, Jack volunteers alongside Roderick and the kingdom’s royal guards, led by Elmont (Ewan McGregor), to climb the beanstalk and rescue the princess.  Though Roderick clearly has a hidden agenda during the mission, a far greater problem emerges when giants appear led by the ruthless Fallon (Bill Nighy), only to kidnap Isabelle, kill a majority of the rescue party, and vow to conquer humanity.  Realizing that all the legends from his childhood are true, Jack must use his wits to save the princess and protect the kingdom from the largest threat it has ever faced.

It may rely a little too heavily on fairy tale cliché to drive its narrative, but the truth is that Jack the Giant Slayer is still a fun and imaginative adventure that grabs your attention and doesn’t let go until the closing credits begin to roll.  When I first saw the trailer for this contemporized fairy tale, I was a little put-off by the special effects used for the giants, but as it turns out, the larger-than-life villains represent the most entertaining element of the film; the goofy individual personalities are a great parallel to their threatening nature, Bill Nighy nails his performance as an engaging villain, and the climactic battle is nothing short of epic.  In terms of the titular hero, I really enjoyed Nicholas Hoult as the charming underdog hero; his reactions of wonder/horror to the giants are believable, while the on-screen chemistry he shares with Eleanor Tomlinson is genuinely sweet.  Add those elements to the gorgeous environments, and the thoroughly witty ending that helps to both solidify and modernize the fairy tale, and Jack the Giant Slayer represents an entertaining adventure that matches the charm of its source material.  Unfortunately, between the underuse of some of the bigger names within the cast and the somewhat sluggish first act of the narrative, this fantasy adventure makes some blatant missteps that hamper the total fulfillment of the film’s potential.

In reintroducing the elements of “Jack and the Beanstalk” to the current generation, it can be argued that Giant Slayer’s exposition-heavy opening was a bit of a necessary evil, but defaulting to ancient clichés when you essentially have a creative blank slate is still disappointing.  To put it simply, if other fairy tale updates can stretch childhood orphans into witch hunters, you have to question the logic of cramming so many familiar elements into the narrative set-up; the rebellious princess running from a duplicitous arranged marriage and falling for a meek simpleton…thank god the giants showed up, because I was getting ready to zone out.  An equally disappointing element involved the script’s treatment of its A-listers; Stanley Tucci and Ewan McGregor clearly tried their best with the material they were given and were, for the most part, entertaining, but Ian McShane has to be embarrassed.  Maybe my negative opinion was mostly influenced by the ludicrous and thoroughly embarrassing costume design the royals within the film were forced to wear, but I have seen far better from the actor, and he easily turns in the worst performance amongst the diverse cast.  So, even though none of the shortcomings within Jack the Giant Slayer are overtly damning, they still serve as blatant reminders that Warner Bros.’ newest project played it a little too safe and squandered the chance to take some true creative risks that could have had a huge payout.

If you were to compare box office receipts against narrative quality, the truth is that Jack and the Giant Slayer deserved to be a modest success amongst moviegoers, but current ticket sales promise nothing less than utter financial disaster.  Against a $195 million production budget, barely covering a third of costs after nearly two weeks in theaters is utterly pathetic, and momentum is going to completely stall once all of March’s high profile releases are set loose.  Any of the family fantasy audience Warner Bros. hoped to attract that wasn’t drawn away by Oz, the Great and Powerful will flock to The Croods in the coming weeks, while older adventure audiences will respond to Olympus has Fallen and G.I. Joe: Retaliation.  In terms of what went wrong, my only guess is that unclear positioning prevented both the family and teenage demographic from realizing that Jack the Giant Slayer could actually provide something entertaining to both groups…but why in the hell wasn’t the universal fairy tale more warmly received overseas and the normally lucrative international market?  The final call is yours, but don’t let the thoroughly disappointing financial performance and the lukewarm critical reception prevent you from giving the latest fairy tale modernization a chance…you may end up falling under the magic of the imaginative adventure after all.
   
Overall Recommendation: Medium